Don't Guilt-Trip Me Obama

We cannot afford to be guilt-tripped into voting for Obama this time around. There are just too many tough problems to fix waiting for the next POTUS. This is not the time to bargain for power.

The Obama BargainBy SHELBY STEELE
March 18, 2008; Page A23

Geraldine Ferraro may have had sinister motives when she said that Barack Obama would not be "in his position" as a frontrunner but for his race. Possibly she was acting as Hillary Clinton's surrogate. Or maybe she was simply befuddled by this new reality -- in which blackness could constitute a political advantage.

AP  
Jesse Jackson and Barack Obama, June 4, 2007.
But whatever her motives, she was right: "If Obama was a white man, he would not be in this position." Barack Obama is, of course, a very talented politician with a first-rate political organization at his back. But it does not detract from his merit to say that his race is also a large part of his prominence. And it is undeniable that something extremely powerful in the body politic, a force quite apart from the man himself, has pulled Obama forward. This force is about race and nothing else.


I won't be hoodwinked or bamboozled into casting a vote just because blacks can guilt-trip whites to do your bidding.

How to turn one's blackness to advantage?

The answer is that one "bargains." Bargaining is a mask that blacks can wear in the American mainstream, one that enables them to put whites at their ease. This mask diffuses the anxiety that goes along with being white in a multiracial society. Bargainers make the subliminal promise to whites not to shame them with America's history of racism, on the condition that they will not hold the bargainer's race against him. And whites love this bargain -- and feel affection for the bargainer -- because it gives them racial innocence in a society where whites live under constant threat of being stigmatized as racist. So the bargainer presents himself as an opportunity for whites to experience racial innocence.

This is how Mr. Obama has turned his blackness into his great political advantage, and also into a kind of personal charisma. Bargainers are conduits of white innocence, and they are as popular as the need for white innocence is strong. Mr. Obama's extraordinary dash to the forefront of American politics is less a measure of the man than of the hunger in white America for racial innocence.

His actual policy positions are little more than Democratic Party boilerplate and hardly a tick different from Hillary's positions. He espouses no galvanizing political idea. He is unable to say what he means by "change" or "hope" or "the future." And he has failed to say how he would actually be a "unifier." By the evidence of his slight political record (130 "present" votes in the Illinois state legislature, little achievement in the U.S. Senate) Barack Obama stacks up as something of a mediocrity. None of this matters much.

(snip)

Because he is black, there is a sense that profound questions stand to be resolved in the unfolding of his political destiny. And, as the Clintons have discovered, it is hard in the real world to run against a candidate of destiny. For many Americans -- black and white -- Barack Obama is simply too good (and too rare) an opportunity to pass up. For whites, here is the opportunity to document their deliverance from the shames of their forbearers. And for blacks, here is the chance to document the end of inferiority. So the Clintons have found themselves running more against America's very highest possibilities than against a man. And the press, normally happy to dispel every political pretension, has all but quivered before Mr. Obama. They, too, have feared being on the wrong side of destiny.

I don't dislike Barack. He's a nice man, he's interesting and quite charming. But pitting blacks against whites again and again is wrong. I have never personally hurt a black person at least not intenionally that I can recall. If anything I have done everything in my power to not appear racist towards anyone.
There are blacks and Koreans in my family. Most families are of mixed races. But that doesn't mean I have to vote for anyone if I don't feel they are ready for POTUS.

We can't afford to be nice this time around.



Display:


Re: Don't Guilt-Trip Me Obama (2.00 / 4)

Bargaining-that article and that word struck a cord with me. Back in the 70s I was a buyer for Raytheon and my co-worker was a single black woman raising 4 sons. I also was a single mom with a daughter.

A promotion came up and was offered to me as I ran circles around this lady on the job. It was also the time of affirmative action-is that the correct term? So being the nice 'white' person I stepped aside thinking this lady needed the money more than I since she had more kids to support. I don't regret doing that but after reading
that article I realize that this bargaining so that I wouldn't look racist is exactly what it was. I had an element of 'guilt-thinking'
in my decision- she has it rougher than me so to speak. But I needed that money too.

I think that's fine on one to one decisions, but not on a position as crucial as the presidency. I have not one doubt that Hillary is far more experienced and ready for the POTUS than Obama.


Honesty is always the best Policy. Go Hillary Go!
by roseeriter on Wed Mar 19, 2008 at 06:37:54 AM EST

I am all for honest votes (none / 0)

and Hillary has always been my first choice and Obama my second.

So we are not in disagreement as I like Obama too, but I did react to his speech with some doubts.


Honesty is always the best Policy. Go Hillary Go!
by roseeriter on Wed Mar 19, 2008 at 06:56:01 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: "People Like Him as a Person?" (2.00 / 6)

"People like him as a person?"

Well, Pardon my Scoffing, but that is ridiculous.

"People" don't even know him as a person. How could they know whether or not they like him? They like their fantasy of him, perhaps; but isn't it a little childish to engage in magical thinking about a person who's going to be taking the most powerful position in the world, when that person has virtually NOTHING on which to base his leadership ability except the fantasy of people's projections?

That is precisely how George W. Bush became the President. People thought they "wanted to have a beer" with him. But, once they knew him, they realized that he's just a petulant, spoiled, bully, who thought he was entitled to such power, and then when he had it, thought he was entitled to do whatever he wanted with it, without limit.

I don't "like" what I've seen from Barack Obama at all. I see a man who callously left his own constituents to freeze in sub-zero winter, while he calculated his political future with a cynical political fixer he called his friend. I see a man who cast 6 votes in the Illinois Senate, then turned around and put in the record that those votes were a "mistake." I see a man who, when it was politically convenient, voted "present" instead of actually working for his constituents--129 times. I see a man who wouldn't lift a finger to help thousands of Maytag and United Airlines workers when they begged for his help to save their pensions--because he had a political donor called the Crowne family, and he wasn't going to hurt himself politically, so he left those working class americans behind for his own political benefit. I see a man who made a speech once, and has cashed in on it while thousands have died in Iraq. I see a dissembler; a liar; a sneaky dealer who bought a house in a secret deal so he could live in a mansion he couldn't afford; who took money from a man under federal investigation; who attended a church where racism and hate and hostility were preached from the pulpit, because he needed black street cred.

This isn't a man people "like." It's a man people don't know. Even his aides say he can be "aloof" and contemptuous of others.


"I never give them hell. I just tell the truth and they think it's hell." Harry S Truman
by Tennessean on Wed Mar 19, 2008 at 08:24:53 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Don't Guilt-Trip Me Obama (2.00 / 2)

I disagree with you absolutely.  He denied having heard the minister last Friday on more than one television program.  Then, in his "race speech" he admitted that he had been in the congregation when the hate-speech was happening.  He said he had received a certain amount of money from Rezko and now admits it was much more.  He says it was a coincidence that Rezko bought the adjacent lot to his house and now admits that he took Rezko on a tour of the house with him before he bought it.  He made a speech against the war when he was in a very libral and safe area of his state and later took the speech down off his website and said that his position is not too different from GWB's.  He admitted in a debate that Hillary's campaign had NOTHING to do with distribution his picture in native garb to Drudge then a few days later, in a campaign speech, accused Hillary's campaign of distributing the picture.  He accused Bill Clinton of being racist when there is not now and has never been the slightest hint of racism about Bill Clinton.  He is a sham who believes, just like GWB, that he can say anything he pleases because even though there is absolute evidence to the contrary, his followers will deny what is absolutely true beyond a doubt.


by macmcd on Wed Mar 19, 2008 at 04:29:59 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Another section of the article applies... (none / 0)

to you!

"But bargainers have an Achilles heel. They succeed as conduits of white innocence only as long as they are largely invisible as complex human beings. They hope to become icons that can be identified with rather than seen, and their individual complexity gets in the way of this. So bargainers are always laboring to stay invisible. (We don't know the real politics or convictions of Tiger Woods or Michael Jordan or Oprah Winfrey, bargainers all.) Mr. Obama has said of himself, "I serve as a blank screen on which people of vastly different political stripes project their own views . . ." And so, human visibility is Mr. Obama's Achilles heel. If we see the real man, his contradictions and bents of character, he will be ruined as an icon, as a "blank screen."


by Shazone on Wed Mar 19, 2008 at 04:46:30 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Don't Guilt-Trip Me Obama (2.00 / 3)

I'll vote for Obama if he wins the primary.
Will you vote for Hillary if she wins?
Honesty is always the best Policy. Go Hillary Go!
by roseeriter on Wed Mar 19, 2008 at 06:42:48 AM EST

The only thing I like about Obama (2.00 / 1)

is that he is Black and he knows how to deliver a speech.  His resume stinks, his injecting race stinks, I don't like his friends from Chicago and if his advisers or maybe his VP includes Bill "Reagan Tax Cuts" Bradley we are fucked, especially with Obama's love for Reagan and all those great ideas.

I totally agree with you that race is not the key issue now, even if you are black and poor and living in the inner city.  We've had 7 plus years of the Bush Touch where everything he touches turns to shit and we need to dig ourselves out a huge hole.  The Clintons did that once, Obama has done absolutely nothing.

I disagree with you about both of them.  I thought is was ridiculous that in such perilous times we'd be promoting two candidates with incredible baggage.  We could lose to McCain with either of them but Edwards would have beaten McCain easily.  

I intensely dislike Obama for the presidency and many people don't want Hillary for all the things they believed thanks to the NY Times, the Washington Post and the Republicans.  There are 1000s of pages on the web that still tell the wrong story about Watergate, filegate, travelgate
and the lies that came out of D'Amato's Senate Banking Committee.  Plus, people are afraid that Bill Clinton will look to screw anything in a skirt.  How could we left ourselves with such awful choices?

I pray the convention will turn into a war where Gore or Edwards emerge as the nominee.  I don't even know if that is possible.  Obama struts around like the cock of the walk with his tiny 100 delegate lead and considering Florida and Michigan and the stupidity of the caucuses, where only people with no responsibilities and youth voted, is no lead at all.

What a mess.


by cpa1a on Wed Mar 19, 2008 at 07:36:53 AM EST

Re: Don't Guilt-Trip Me Obama (2.00 / 3)

I'm not susceptible to guilt trips.

Barack Obama has not earned credibility in my view, as time has passed. He has lost most of it.

I'm just not sure at all I will support him in November, if he becomes the nominee. I won't support McCain.

But, I can vote "present."


"I never give them hell. I just tell the truth and they think it's hell." Harry S Truman
by Tennessean on Wed Mar 19, 2008 at 08:33:40 AM EST

Re: Don't Guilt-Trip Me Obama (none / 0)

Unfortunately, Supreme Court justices tend not to vote "present."


by Zorro the Greek on Wed Mar 19, 2008 at 08:45:46 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Don't Guilt-Trip Me Obama (2.00 / 0)

As a European looking at the US priparies it's increddibly hard to understand, that what is completely clear from the outsid, is so difficult to see from the inside.
I think BHO will be a capable leader, he has shown his ability to lead in his carrier and in his presidential campaign. But the most important positive in his presidency would be the fact, that he would give the clearest signal possible to the rest of the world, that the USA is ready to join the human race again. Angry, old, conservative white man have turned their backs to the world and have made very clear that the USA will look out for number one everytime all the time.
Replacing the angry, old, conservative, white man with an angry, old, conservative, white woman will not do very much to change the course of history.
So forget the guilt complex and do the USA and the rest of the world the favor of turning the page of history to a new and better chapter.
by hebi on Wed Mar 19, 2008 at 08:47:21 AM EST

On one level I kind of agree with you (2.00 / 2)

but there have been too many questionable things attached to Obama himself. Rezko, Wright,his wife's position and pay raise after an earmark, and bully tactics that don't sit well with many people, including me.


Honesty is always the best Policy. Go Hillary Go!
by roseeriter on Wed Mar 19, 2008 at 09:21:29 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: On one level I kind of agree with you (none / 0)

I've never in my whole life met anyone that never made a mistake. HRC made a few of her own (she should have dumped the guy she's married with a while back, she was not very smart when it comes to real-estate, she hired the wrong CHIEF STRATEGIST etc.), so has McCain.
It seems to me that the media in the US are zooming in to the detail so much that it has become impossible to see the huge positive in Obama
For the rest of the world he is a real game-changer, and do you guys need a game changer at this point of time.

by hebi on Wed Mar 19, 2008 at 10:12:47 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Don't Guilt-Trip Me Obama (2.00 / 2)

I demand to differ.  Hillary Clinton is not old by today's actuarial statistics, she seems far less angry than Obama and his supporters, and she is most certainly not "conservative"...saying that proves you know nothing about her voting record. The only thing you got right is that she is white.


by miriam on Wed Mar 19, 2008 at 04:29:46 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Don't Guilt-Trip Me Obama (none / 0)

It's a free country, Miriam.
My parents are 80 and 82 and I think they are still young, but I also think it's not really strange to position HRC in the generation of politicians that have had their chance to change the world for the better.
"Shame on you Barack Obama" HRC is I think objectively the more agressive candidate when compared to BHO, and boy, guys like Wolfsson and Penn, have you ever listened to a conference call with these guys.
Reading that somenone puts HRC in the DLC, New Democrat, conservative part of the Democratic party can't be such a big surprise to you. I'd be surprised if it was the first time you've heard that. It's not something to be ashamed about, but it's consistent with how Bill operated, populist on the campaign trail, conservative in the White House.
by hebi on Thu Mar 20, 2008 at 05:01:06 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Last I checked... (2.00 / 1)

...racial divisiveness was somewhere around nowhere in the top-10 issues of concern to the general American public, at least as far as their issues focus was concerned with regard to this presidential primary.

Hmmm...let's see...the worst economy since...ummmm...at least the Depression...maybe ever!

A war in Iraq that's costing us trillions of dollars...yes, trillions!

Municipalities going bankrupt by the dozens, and student loan programs in Michigan and New Hampshire shutting their doors without any notice because of just the effects of the tip of the iceberg of a credit crunch that's affected bond markets so badly, nobody has faith in U.S. bond markets anymore, so there will simply be no more financing of these vital services, period!

Gasoline prices and food--YES, FOOD--being subject to hyperinflation in coming months. (When was the last time we saw that word, "hyperinflation," in the dialogue about the economy of this country? Ummmm...try, NEVER!)

Forget about foreclosures...nobody's going to be able to afford to freakin' eat or send their kids to school in a few months, let alone worry about the trivial things like having a roof over their heads, due to the now-rapidly-escalating foreclosure crisis, too.

More than 40,000,000 Americans without healthcare.

The ozone layer and greenhouse gases, increasing exponentially, whereby if something isn't done in the next 2-4 years, much of the planet will be to a point of no return, ecologically (much of it already is).

And, we're all sitting around here talking about making Obama and his pre-emptive public relations efforts and dialogue about race relations (i.e.: him and his candidacy, and no other subject) the most key issue over the next seven months, instead, disaffecting those fence-sitting folks that can't understand why we're not discussing and focusing on all of the above, instead?

While the Bushies spend hundreds of billions of more taxpayer dollars in "welfare for the ultra-rich?"

Am I the only one having a problem with where all this is going, and will continue to go, in terms of the focus of the election issues...bringing it all back to one issue...and one that doesn't even break the top-10 as far as what WAS on the mind of the voters this year? (Until Obama shrewdly turned the tables on everyone, putting everything else off the agenda? Does anyone think he won't continue to focus upon this if he's our nominee come the general election?)

Is it me? Or, am I the only one that thinks that maybe--just maybe--we have some bigger fish to fry this year?

(Don't get me wrong. Obama's move here has been nothing short of brilliant; but possibly an effort that will result in a very failed/fatal conclusion, at the very worst time in our country's history in the past 100 years, IMHO.)


by bobswern on Wed Mar 19, 2008 at 09:59:08 AM EST

Re: Don't Guilt-Trip Me Obama (2.00 / 3)

I agree. We can't afford to be nice this time around. Or complacent.


by Fleaflicker on Wed Mar 19, 2008 at 11:32:03 AM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.